Fila bresalario: a dog known for high intelligence and pure brute force, the fila bresalario breed has been banned in the uk, denmark, norway and many other countries as well take one look at it and it looks like a tank covered in fur. Banned or restricted by cities in: mississippi and utah the shar pei hasn't been as widely banned as many other dog breeds however, several cities restrict residents from owning these compact dogs. Pit bulls, like these in oxford, mississippi, arouse strong passions to some, they are canine killers that should be banned to others, they are victims of prejudice and misunderstanding. When the province of ontario banned new ownership of pit bull-type dogs in 2005, the frequency of dog bites didn't change in its capital, toronto — only the breeds that did the most biting. 98% believed adding more breeds to the banned list would have no effect in preventing further dog attacks and 78% of experts supported the compulsory training of new dog owners.
However, certain breeds of owners should be banned this is because it is the owners that cause the dog to be vicious a pit bull does have a slight tendency to be more aggressive than the average do, but it is the owner that makes the dog vicious in the first place. Banned in denmark, singapore and various municipalities, the american bulldog's origins are in the deep south, where it was used as a farm dog. If breed specific prosecutions are legal -- and they certainly should be -- then breed specific regulations also should be legal at some point, the laws against breed specific legislation should be repealed or at least revised, so that the bigger, more powerful dogs can, like goats and chickens and a host of entirely benign animals, be banned. There are no valid points to why dangerous breeds of dogs should be banned, because for every so called dangerous breed of dog you ban, there is one so called gentle breed of dog that could inflict serious harm.
While yes, it is possible for any breed of dog to turn nasty, certain breeds are just far too dangerous and should be very strictly controlled, if not banned moderator cl60. No, certain breeds of dog shouldnt be banned, but maybe we should work out a way of banning certain people from owning pets, period i personally think its ridiculous to target specific breeds of dogs, if they target the top 5 breeds responsible for dog attacks, there will be a new top 5 list, once the originals are gone, then how long will it. The truth is, any breed of dog (or mix) can be aggressive labeling a breed as dangerous may even give people a false sense of security around other breeds instead, the public should be educated about dog bite prevention and responsible dog ownership.
This proves that neither the dog breeds are to be banned nor dog breeding as a whole there are bad apples within dog breeders and we all need to make sure these bad breeders cannot breed any longer kennel clubs and other international authorities should use their leverage to stop the hemorrhage. Breeds of dogs should not be banned, as they are a part of life even if certain breeds of dogs pose a threat to some people, they should not be banned this is because they represent a part of life and should therefore be allowed to live. Should towns, states or countries be allowed to ban certain dog breeds, like pit bulls take our poll and share your thoughts in the comments get the milford newsletter.
One downside with the selective breeding is that it gave birth to dog breeds that are unnaturally aggressive to be around people get to know the top dog breeds that are banned in some other parts of the world and find out why. Of course a dog doesn't constitute arms under the 2nd amendment, but it may be instructive to think of certain dog breeds as tools of self-defense when discussing the pros and cons of a ban a dog is a companion, but under certain circumstances, a dog can also be a tool for self-defense. Breed specific legislation or as it is often called, bsl, is a law that bans or restricts certain types of dogs based on their appearance or breed in an effort to decrease dog attacks on humans or other animals. It should be changed to focus on the acts of the owner and not literally on what the dog looks like, because that simply isn't working image caption lots of owners argue banned breeds can make. Arguments against dog breed laws 'severely flawed' retraining your dog with the abc we shouldn't focus on dangerous breeds dangerous dog laws: it's nurture, not nature an alternative to breed.
We need to ban all dangerous dog breeds if they have the capacity to kill, we have no place keeping them in our homes source:news limited. Breed-specific legislation (bsl) is a law to prohibit or restrict the keeping of particular types of dog some jurisdictions have enacted breed-specific legislation in response to a number of well-publicized incidents involving pit bull-type dogs or other dog breeds commonly used in dog fighting, and some government organizations such as the united states army and marine corps have taken. Though restrictions on breeds vary by base and service, a number of breeds are universally banned including pit bulls, rottweilers, doberman pinschers, chows, american bulldogs, akitas, and wolf.
Breed-specific legislation (bsl) is the blanket term for laws that either regulate or ban certain dog breeds in an effort to decrease dog attacks on humans and other animals however, the problem of dangerous dogs will not be remedied by the quick fix of breed-specific laws—or, as they should truly be called, breed-discriminatory laws. Breed specific legislation (bsl) is defined as a law or statute that equates the qualities of a dangerous dog with a certain breed, and bans or restricts certain breeds based on identity, not behavior of a specific animal (weiss, 2001. There is nothing wrong with these dog breeds there is something wrong when a legislator decides he knows what is right or wrong for us, and decides to use his powers against a race of dog maybe legislators should be banned every time there is a biting incident, especially if it is serious, a pit.